Election Fraud, Bond Fraud, Property Tax Fraud
A Preview of the Talking Points in the 2nd Amendment to the Crimial Complaint

By MItchell Vexler, April 17, 2026

Live links to more Articles and evidentiary documents included

Link to accompanying info-graphic presentation, The Nexus of Fraud

Why Voting Fraud matters?

Is it worth an hour of your time to review this Article and the upcoming 2nd Amendment to the Criminal Complaint so that you might save several hundred thousand dollars over the next 30 years of your hard earned money and not transfer that money via fraud into the pockets of criminals? In addition to this Article, you might want to read the 1st Amendment to the Criminal Complaint.

The evidence in this Article and 2nd Amendment to the Criminal Complaint exposes State and Federal voter fraud, school election fraud, school district bond fraud, and Central Appraisal District (CAD) property tax fraud all of which steals your money which is further siphoned off into pet projects that you did not vote for, and or was embezzled into other criminal activity. Think Minnesota on steroids, across the Nation and in your district with a pattern and practice so heinous it tries to cover up its treasonous fraud using math to scramble its footprint of existence.

Let’s start at the upper level with this very recent wake-up call.

Liberals Advance Bill That Could Criminalize Quoting The Bible As Hate Speech

Wednesday, Apr 08, 2026

Canada is barreling toward a chilling new reality where quoting certain Bible passages could be treated as a criminal hate speech offense.

Bill C-9, the so-called Combating Hate Act, cleared the House of Commons on March 25 and now moves to the Senate. 

Critics say the legislation guts a decades-old legal safeguard that protected sincere religious expression, handing prosecutors new tools to target Christians and other believers who dare reference holy texts on topics like sexuality.

Canada just criminalized the Bible. Bill C-9 has passed.

Quoting Scripture on marriage, sin, or God’s design for sexuality can now be prosecuted as “willful promotion of hatred.

Do you support free speech?

Do you support the 1^st Amendment of the Constitution of the United States of America?

Yes?

Then this is exactly why voter fraud is illegal and such actions are Treasonous. Voter fraud by software manipulation is intent to defraud and the manipulated math to defraud would not exist but for the intent. Every Citizen must seek out the fraud and hold the criminals accountable.

This is what we are doing in the 2nd Amendment to the Criminal Complaint, which irrefutably proves that voter fraud, at both the Federal and State levels, occurred.

There is No Alternative  

Under the guise of law, this is the same nonsense wherein a catch phrase is made up which in reality is the exact opposite of the promotion of the newly created law. This newly jingled socialist law replaces long standing laws and Constitutional law. This has already appeared in Germany, UK, and Europe all three of which are causing their own economic unnecessary demise! 

This is why citizenry apathy is no longer an option and focus on the fraud is crucial. Every voting Citizen must be involved or face losing the future of what you believe in and what 1.19 million members of the military have died for since the founding of this Country, which is to protect the American Way of Life for all of society.

It is often said that “we get the government we choose to elect, hence the government we deserve”. However, is that the truth? What if the evidence proves, it is not the truth and who was allegedly elected into office was put there by election fraud? What if that person in office was not supposed to be there? What if that judge, who was elected, was not supposed to be there? What if someone voted to put debt on your house in the form of school district bonds, that you don’t approve of and what if that school district bond election was illegal? How exactly does due process under the 5th and 14th Amendments to the U.S. Constitution exist, when voter fraud has occurred?

The ramifications of this election fraud, school district bond election fraud, bond fraud and property tax fraud, affect every single citizen given that the liabilities spun from these frauds end up causing inflation and extend into the future with compound cumulative interest for 20 to 40 years, from today, as the fraudulent liabilities that the criminals created are not being paid off but rolled out in time and interest rates rolled up until the system implodes on its own weight. This implosion will happen because of the fact that the Median Household Income does not exist to pay off the debt and liabilities imposed by fraudsters. As an example, Argyle Texas has over $243,000 of outstanding fraudulent school district bond debt per household today where the median value of a home is $450,000. That $243K increases annually with interest and more fraudulent bonds being raised being the definition of reverse amortization. This is happening across the U.S. and currently estimated at $5.1 Trillion in outstanding fraudulent school district bonds today.

Voting for ever-higher punitive taxes, being both income and property, on the rich is economic suicide and the result of Institutionalized Systemic Moral Hazard. There are not enough rich people, so when the sociopaths run out of rich people to steal money from, your next.

Consider that a wealthy New Yorker can get a raise of almost 40% just by moving. If moving eliminates a 14.8% top state and local tax rate, our top-tier taxpayer gets a 36% raise, not a 14.8% raise, by leaving. Based on my experience examining the propaganda used by State leaders, I would bet that none of them have done any math. When that top tier taxpayer leaves, then who is left to pick up that portion of the burden? The answer is every other taxpaying citizen remaining.  This means their burden...your burden of the “fair share” goes up which is impossible to pay for because the Median Household Income does not exist!

Here’s how the math works.

A rich New Yorker pays a maximum state and city income tax of 14.8%, on top of a maximum federal tax of 37%. But there are hidden taxes. Uncapped Medicare and Medicaid taxes push the marginal federal tax to 39.4%. If the income is earned on investments, the Net Investment Income Tax (NIIT, another Obamacare failed construct) adds another 3.8%, pushing the top federal tax above 43%. Then add on top of that, the property tax is used to support fraudulent school district bond debt plus interest accumulating by the second.

So, top-tier New York taxpayers may soon pay a marginal tax of 43% to the IRS and 17% to the city and state of New York. The combined 60% marginal tax rates mean they have the privilege of keeping 40 cents of each new dollar they earn. A move to one of the nine states with no income tax allows our taxpayer to keep 57% of every additional dollar of income, instead of 40%. That’s a 42% raise.

When I left Canada, my taxes were 75% net effective. 

Forget the argument about “paying their fair share.” “Fair” is an entirely subjective, bait and switch term, and nothing more than propaganda, not backed up by math or evidence. 

Over taxation is not unique to New York. California’s headline top rate of 13.3% becomes 14% with the phase-out of deductions. A Silicon Valley billionaire can keep 43% of each new dollar of income by Moving to Dallas or Miami, or Anchorage which boosts this to 57%, a raise of almost 33%.

It is also said that “People have called the United States 50 laboratories of democracy”. A state or a city is welcome to impose whatever taxes, regulations, or laws are allowed by its own bylaws or the Constitution. Except, this statement is also propaganda, because the Supremacy Clause Article Ten of the U.S. Constitution specifically establishes that the U.S. constitution, being federal laws and treaties override any state laws that conflict with them. It promulgates that all state laws, state courts, and state constitutions are subordinate to the U.S. Constitution and federal laws and treaties made by the U.S. government. However, federal statutes must be pursuant to the U.S. Constitution for the Supremacy Clause to apply; that is, not violate the U.S. Constitution, such as the Bill of Rights.  As the 16^th Amendment specifically prohibits taxation on unrealized gains (article titled The Legacy of Governor Abbott) , allowing only for taxation on incomes, then what has been imposed by the States in the form of real estate tax and the resulting school district bonds violates the 16^th Amendment as well as dozens of State and Federal Laws.   

Milton Friedman has been credited with the observation “that the only thing more mobile than the wealthy is their capital. It is the rich who largely fund government spending, whether that spending is at the federal, state, or local level, and whether that spending is wise or foolish. Instead of a politics of envy, perhaps we should try a politics of gratitude.”

Pushing the rich via over taxation is economic suicide and touches the lives of every single Citizen whether a taxpayer or not.

Now, given the evidence with regard to the Federal Reserve being a socialist organization and the desire of socialist organizations, such as your school district creating debts which can’t be paid for, their true intent is control of money and thus control of the population.

How is this control achieved? The answer is simple. Rig the voting allowing for a pre-determined cast of criminals who believe in their power over that of their constituents and who’s intent is to equity strip their constituents in a plethora of “wouldn’t it be great if we could stop bank runs” (Federal Reserve created in 1913), “we need do this for the children” (school district bonds fraud), “we need to rescue the banks” (Federal Reserve 2007), “take the shot because society depends on it” (covid) etc., all of which are the creation of socialist policies, and all of which have proven to be extraordinarily damaging not just on a local, and national level but on a global scale. Society would be considerably wealthier if all 4 of these events and the socialist policies that created them never existed.

The 2^nd Amendment to the Criminal Complaint now adds to the Original Criminal Complaint and the 1^st Amendment to the Criminal Complaint, and proves the existence and use of sophisticated algorithmic manipulation (Voter Shifting Algorithms) of ballot data by means of hidden vote distortion logic (HVDL) that produces controlled, yet organic-appearing results. This HVDL happened to leave a synthetic digital signature in the data across multiple jurisdictions and years of elections around the Nation, confirming deliberate coding rather than chance or error. This HVDL could only have been deployed with the intent to defraud American citizens on an industrial scale, and constituting a criminal enterprise under RICO § 1961(1) at both the State and Federal levels.  This voter software manipulation and the attempt to hide the voter shifting algorithms is Treason as you will see in the 2nd Amendment to the Criminal Complaint.

The “Defendants outlined in the 2^nd Amendment to the Criminal Complaint, while acting or purporting to act, under the color of an official capacity, which includes the ordering of the voting machines that enable and/or deploy HVDL have exerted an authority beyond the scope of his / her / their office and or took positions that denied the Citizens of the United States the full and free access to, and/or enjoyment of, rights secured by the Constitution and laws of both all States and the United States of America.   

The Secretaries of State, Attorney Generals, and the attorneys for each County are deemed to know the law. “Officers of the court have no immunity…when violating a constitution right for are deemed to know the law.” Owens v Independence 100 S.C.T. 1398   Officers of the Court know that properly applying the facts to the law is NOT discretionary. (Walker v Packer, 827 S.W.sd 833, 840 (Tex. 1992)) and misapplying the facts to the law in a matter is an abuse of discretion and constitutes Official Oppression.

A special category of investigation by the SEC is warranted regarding any Securities firm who sold school district bonds without any due diligence on the bonds and the underwriting of those bonds, and the lack of disclosure to the bond buyers with regard to the ability of those bonds to be retired. Did the Securities firms have knowledge on the use of HVDL which could provide cover for their activities or provide cover for the activities of the election of state school district officials and or Federal officials, to keep the fee machine running? Did the Securities firms knowingly commit fraud in the underwriting of the school district bonds? The evidence of how this was done is in the 1st Amendment to the Criminal Complaint and has also been delivered to the SCOTX in the Amicus Brief.

We now have reason to believe and do believe that the named Defendants as well as those in similar positions across the United States have committed various crimes against the laws of their State and throughout the United States, including but not limited to Official Misconduct, Official Oppression, Sedition and Treason (voting machine and software providers) of which facts and violations are listed in the 2^nd Amendment to the Criminal Complaint.

How many cases of voter fraud across the U.S. occurred that can’t be answered because in many cases access to the Cast Voter Records (CVR) was denied, or lost, or delayed or modified years later? Regardless of this denial, it should not be up to citizens to have to file lawsuits, which takes time and money to prove what is already required in law. This time and money, being delay and expense, are what the criminals depend on to keep the fraud in perpetual motion. It is up to the government, being both State and Federal, to prove that the laws were not violated… and they can’t. In Vexler’s case, (see both the Response and the article The Importance of the Vexler case to Texas and the United States), now at the SCOTX, I have had to file lawsuits almost annually since 2017 and have demonstrated beyond reproach that the methods of “valuation” by the CADs are pure fraud in violation of both State and Federal laws. No election can be called legitimate unless it can be proven that the software does not contain voter shifting algorithms. The voting machines utilizing such software are a crime scene. Just like the software being used at the CADs that allow the employees to tamper with data and change that data to suit a pre-determined school district budgets which has zero to do with Uniform Standards of Professional Appraisal Practice (USPAP) or Uniform and Equal under States laws. Crimes were committed ending in Trillions of dollars of school district bond fraud, with this liability fraudulently transferred to the backs of the property owners and renters, and wherein the inflationary effects of these crimes is affect all Citizens today and for the next 20 to 40 years or until these bonds are put into bankruptcy along with the school districts that created them.

The software used by the CADs and the voting software used by the States were both designed to allow fraud to occur. 

1. What evidence exists that these crimes were not committed? 
2. What evidence exists of true transparency? 
3. Given the evidence of crimes outlined in the 2^nd Amendment of the Criminal Complaint, and lack of prosecution, how exactly are elections and software manipulation safeguarded?

The answer is none, none, and they aren’t.

The investigation and prosecution demands of the Defendants found within this Criminal Complaint (2nd Amendment to the Criminal Complaint), upon the DOJ, FBI, and SEC are necessary to (1) safeguard future elections, (2) terminate all Central Appraisal Districts as they are beyond repair and (3) terminate any school district from having access to the bond markets ever again. The nexus between all three is software fraud which allows for accounting fraud, which allows for bond fraud, all of which are inter-connected and all of which are illegal.

Why we need to repeal ALL property tax and why voting matters...it’s all connected:

Is the person, or people, elected to office responsible for allowing the overvaluation and over taxation, along with the school district bond fraud, and school district bond election fraud the rightful occupier of that position? How do you know? Did you vote for people who would put you in a position to lose the roof over your head, because you can’t afford the fraudulent taxation? Did you vote to go bankrupt to support your school district? Did you vote for a sociopath? 

Your money is their source of funding for their criminal activities.

1. Violation of 16^th Amendment     

• People are taxed out of their homes, adversely impacting senior citizens with homes paid off. 
• Financially bankrupting Homeowners forces them to sell their home and move.
• Young Adults are priced out of Home Ownership. Appraisal District software helps set fraudulent floor on home prices.
• You will never own, or have the opportunity to own, the roof over your head.
• Equity stolen. The real estate tax steals what would be your amortized equity and that is equity stripping.
• Your real estate tax is their mechanism to fund fraudulent ISD Bonds and pay for the interest on those fraudulent bonds for as long as those fraudulent bonds exist. 
• The majority of school districts that raise bond money are bankrupt, and property taxpayers are paying to delay their eventual bankruptcy. It is literally shoving hard earned money into the pockets of lenders who invested in fraud.
• Your 401k, Pension and IRA may have invested in the fraudulent school district bonds.

2. 2008 bank crisis + this bond crisis = now many times (80X) worse than Enron.

See Amicus Brief filed with the Supreme Court of Texas.

Example: May 2025, Celina ISD (Independent School District) was recently able to pass $2,275,695,579 in bonds. There are approx. 9,377 households in Celina, TX. That’s $242,689 in ISD debt per household, in 1 year, without counting the servicing interest or the past bond raises or the off-balance sheet financing.

• Bonds do not pay teacher salaries or any M&O (Maintenance and Operations)
• Large amounts of ISD bonds are purchased through Teacher Pensions, meaning the teachers themselves are in harm’s way.
• Large amounts of ISD bonds are purchased by institutions as a collateral requirement.
• AAA Credit Ratings based on “Unlimited Ad Valorem Pledges” or “Unlimited Tax” (no such thing). Unless you have Unlimited earnings there is no such thing as Unlimited tax.
• Bond debt has skyrocketed and mathematically cannot be paid back as is required in law. The underwriting of the bonds cannot be backed up based on fundamental math.
• ISD Bonds are insolvent which has bankrupted cities and schools & property owners.
• The interest to service $2 billion in Bonds over 30 years is approximately $9 billion in additional cost not including new bonds being raised annually.
• This issue is playing out not just in Texas but across the U.S.

3. There is No Recourse or Due Process, as Property Rights have been stripped which violates 5^th & 14^th Amendment.

• CAD (Central Appraisal District) is responsible for accurately valuing our homes. They can’t and don’t as the software being used is designed to allow fraud to be committed.
• ARB (Appraisal Review Board) is supposed to support property owners in protesting their home value when a property owner does not agree with the CAD’s home value. The ARB (or Board of Equalization) is an illusion of legitimacy. They are incapable in law of determining fraud or understanding USPAP.
• The CADs often use renegade value software that falls out of legal requirements in order to back the CAD’s pre-determined budget into a home value. This allows them to achieve higher revenue and has nothing to do with USPAP – Uniform Standards of Professional Appraisal Practice. See partial list of violations of law by the CADs and school districts.
• The CAD and the ARB are working together, often to bully and confuse homeowners into accepting an overvaluation. The ARB (Appraisal Review Board or Board of Equalization) is an illusion of legitimacy working for a CAD that commits fraud for its owner, being the School Districts that commits bond fraud. 
• The CAD & School Districts claim immunity and use the Appraisal Review Board, as the exclusive remedy, which is a Constitutional issue because the ARB does not have the authority or ability in law to determine fraud thus the ARB itself is aiding and abetting fraud. In Federal law, there is no immunity for fraud.
• The Protest process is not fair, or uniform and equal, as required under law, in the Texas Constitution, or the majority of State’s Constitutions, and certainly not under the U.S. Constitution.
• All past and future data has been intentionally corrupted by using software that allows the hand overwriting of values, meaning the software is designed to allow fraud to be committed.

SOLUTION A: Bill to Repeal all Property Tax in Favor of the Uniform States Sales Tax (follow link)

• Immediately end all property tax in favor of the Uniform States Sales Tax
• In Texas, Sales Tax goes up to a maximum of 15% for 3 years until stabilization. There should be 0 (zero) bonds remaining after 3 years. And if they cannot be paid off in 3 years, the bonds and schools districts are put into bankruptcy and the liability removed from the back of all property owners, thus all property tax repealed. Then after year 3 years the Sales Tax drops to 11-12% moving forward because the fraud has been removed from the system.
• No impact on food and medicine except for potential deflation.
• STOPS all Bonds and requires ISD’s turn over all the accounting, including the bond CUSIP’s and amortizations schedules, within 60 days of passing the Bill to Repeal All Property Tax.
• Within 60 days ISDs must prove ability to pay off all Bonds within 3 years or face immediate Bankruptcy.
• Eliminates Billions in agencies’ waste fraud and abuse, thus reducing the revenues needed.
• Puts money back into the classrooms and promotes quality teachers and higher teacher pay.
• Requires transparency to the public, fully visible via transparent on-line check registers from the State Comptroller’s office.

All property owners will own their land and thus restore the amortization schedule from which to build their equity rather than having that equity stripped via fraudulent real estate tax and fraudulent school district bonds.  The property owners will end up owning their property in 20 to 30 years when the mortgage is paid off so that they have a retirement vehicle.

SOLUTION B: Prosecution of those who participated in the creation of software designed to rig votes and data using sophisticated algorithmic manipulation being Voter Shifting Algorithms (VSA) by means of Hidden Vote Distortion Logic (HVDL) that produces controlled, yet organic-appearing results which then tries to cover its tracks leaving behind artifacts known as Lockstep Parallel Motion (LPM)

1. The 2nd Amendment to the Criminal Complaint exposes the existence of an algorithm so heinous and treasonous that politically opposed voters are changing their minds in perfect unison.

The analysis of the certified Cast Vote Record shows that for the first 85% of mail-in ballots, the two opposing groups changed their minds at the exact same proportional rate. For example, as A voters' opposition dropped from 80% to 60%, B voters' opposition simultaneously dropped from 60% to 45%.

As support for the proposition ebbed and flowed, the gap between the two groups remained perfectly constant. The analysis states that B voters shifted their Yes/No ratio at exactly six-tenths the rate of A voters, maintaining a perfect linear relationship.

It's as if two groups, who couldn't possibly coordinate, were moving in perfect formation. The analysis explains this phenomenon, called "Lockstep Parallel Motion," with a powerful observation:

"That which is imposed upon an entire county is imposed upon every population within it — compelling all people, in all places, to do the same thing at the same time. And what do we call all populations doing the same thing at the same time? Synchronization."

2. There’s a Simple Test to See if These Patterns Are Natural—and They Almost Always Vanish.

How can we know if a pattern like this is a genuine demographic trend or something artificial? The analysis proposes a powerful method called the Precinct-Preserved Shuffle Test (PPST). In simple terms, the PPST is like taking all the ballots and shaking them up, but with one crucial rule: each ballot is only shuffled with other ballots from its own precinct. This breaks any artificial sequence imposed during the count while preserving all natural geographic and demographic trends.

The test posits this simple question: “If we shuffle ballots only within their own precincts, does the miracle pattern survive?”

To measure the results, the analysis uses "sigma" (σ), a statistical term for how improbable an event is. A "5-sigma" result is the gold standard in physics for declaring a new discovery, meaning there's only a 1 in 3.5 million probability of it happening by chance.

When a X-County data is shuffled using the PPST, the lockstep pattern vanishes completely. The perfectly synchronized dance becomes random static. According to the analysis, the original, unshuffled result is a 12-sigma event—a level of improbability that is, for all practical purposes, statistically impossible to achieve by accident.

3. The Cause Isn't Voter Behavior, But a "Flip Function" Applied to Everyone.

If voter behavior doesn't explain the synchronization, what does? The analysis proposes a mechanism called a "Flip Function." The concept is explained using a "weighted coin toss" analogy. Imagine the system treats every "No" vote on the proposition not as final, but as subject to a hidden coin toss, whilst leaving the "Yes" votes untouched.

The "chance to flip" from 'No' to 'Yes' isn't constant; it changes rhythmically as more ballots are counted. For example, early in the count, a 'No' vote might have a 16% chance of being flipped to a 'Yes'. Later on, that chance might rise to 65%.

The most crucial point is that this function is applied uniformly across the entire county. It doesn't target specific parties, districts, or demographics. This uniformity is the proposed cause of the lockstep motion.

For instance, if an algorithm flips 25% of all 'No' votes to 'Yes', then "half of No-Votes for A and B voters, in all districts, will be flipped from No to Yes." Because every subgroup is influenced by the same invisible force at the same time, they all appear to "dance the same dance."

"The software doesn’t need to “aim” at each district. It just applies the same flip function to every ballot in the county, no matter who cast it or where it came from."

4. These Patterns Aren't Isolated—They Appear Across Different States and Election Cycles.

The findings from X-County are not unique. According to the source documents, similar lockstep patterns and other statistical anomalies have been identified in certified Cast Vote Records from multiple jurisdictions across the country.

The forensic analyses presented in this Article and the 2^nd Amendment to the Criminal Complaint makes a consistent claim and shows the pattern and practice: analyzing the sequence of certified vote data reveals repeatable, statistically anomalous patterns that cannot be explained by normal voter behavior or demographics.

These patterns are not based on interpretation but on direct visualization and mathematical testing of the state's own certified records.

Whether it's the appearance of "lockstep motion" where none should exist, or a conspicuous "lack of lockstep" where it should be expected, the research of Edward Solomon and Dr. Andrew Paquette argues these are identifiable, testable, and deeply unnatural phenomena. This leaves us with a story of treason. The official totals tell us who won, but the sequence of the votes tells an impossible story of how we got there.

SOLUTION C:

(i) The immediate cessation of all electronic voting machines and the voter shifting algorithms contained therein.

(ii) The immediate termination of all Central Appraisal Districts that use software that is designed to allow fraud to be perpetrated.

There is much more to be seen in the 2nd Amendment to the Criminal Complaint.