Unelected Officials
By Mitchell Vexler, July 30, 2026
After doing an interview with Daniela Cambone a few days ago, I wrote a brief memo to one of the attorneys which stated…
The total value of the school district bond losses is greater than $5.1 trillion. If they implode on their own weight without controlled demolition (i.e. repealing all property tax in favor of a Uniform States Sales Tax), the U.S. treasuries will be hours behind because without credibility the market participants will all head for the exit at the same time. Controlled demolition is credibility as that is what adults would do and what the law allows to be done.
This is also part of the National Security Risk.
As I stated at the Fraud Fighters Symposium in Las Vegas, no person has been able to disprove any fact in the filed Complaints (link) or in the 2nd Amendment to the Criminal Complaint (link) or in the Presentation (link) itself. I sincerely ask them to disprove any element, because it is important.
Attached are the Pattern and Practice (link), The Constitutional Crisis of Non Adjudication (Volume I) and Who Watches the Watchers (link) (Volume II) which I wrote using audits that state AGs had done on the school districts and CADs. I collected these audits over a period of roughly 2 years. To my knowledge, no one ever thought to correlate the documents and look for the common thread. I did this because I have hundreds of emails from Mom and Pop across the U.S. and Canada, and there are thousands of Petitions which were signed on my website, which allowed me to see and quantify the economic harm. This fraud is across the United States as shown in V1 and V2. Prohibition of adjudication not only leads to the destruction of The U.S. Constitution, rendering it meaningless, but it is also the key to a communist criminal foothold in the U.S. This is also part of the National Security Risk to which I have been referring.
The largest component of the National Security Risk is what SCOTX did, which is Deprivation of Rights Under Color of Law, a Judicial Coup against the Federal Government and The Constitution of the United States of America being the 1st, 5th, 6th, and 14th Amendments, which in combination would lead to the 13th Amendment being involuntary servitude. What SCOTX did is create a replicable architecture, in that, should another state follow SCOTX, the Constitution of the United States would be rendered meaningless. THE WAR OF INDEPENDENCE was fought over NO TAXATION WITHOUT REPRESENATION. Representation is the law and SCOTX “DENIED” access to both state and federal constitutions. Thus, SCOTX has set the architecture (if not reversed and remanded by SCOTUS) for an act of war which has already occurred in the history of the United States of America.
I am constantly amazed how one piece of evidence or one thought or one video springboards more thoughts and thus this Article.
One of the core tenets of our republic is the idea that government derives its just powers from the consent of the governed. This principle, embodied in our Constitution, ensures that the American people are the ultimate authority. However, in recent years, we've seen an alarming trend with unelected bureaucrats in both State and Federal jurisdictions utilize more power than the people’s elected representatives (i.e. the ARB / BOE Panels at a state level or the horrific behavior ending in the death of hundreds of thousands of Americans as seen in testimony of the disgraced Director of the National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases). I see no difference between this director of infectious disease and the German ss officer and physician notorious for his role at the Auschwitz concentration camp during World War II, where he conducted inhumane medical experiments on prisoners. The actions of these unelected officials are the equivalent of a shell game, that being, who is really in control, why did the elected officials sub-out their tax dollar paid responsibilities, and who receives the benefit? This creation of unelected officials undermines the very foundation of the Republic.
The Chevron case was created in 1984 to give deference to the unelected departments of Federal government. Chevron instructs judges to defer to unelected bureaucrats’ “reasonable” interpretation of laws they are tasked with carrying out, instead of interpreting the law for themselves. Like a cancer, it found its way into the state-level unelected officials. It was terminated by SCOTUS in 2024, (argued by Philip Hamburger) as a result of the fact that for almost 40 years those unelected officials skated, if not, outright violated constitutional law and many of which are the direct cause of the inflation created by printing money which is a hidden tax on the public and which was done at the hands of the Federal Reserve another “independent” by their own definition entity.
The Federal Reserve can set monetary policy, such as interest rates, without direct interference from Congress or the President. “This independence helps maintain economic stability and credibility in its decisions…” This is a direct quote and pure propaganda. Stability is not having a sister (U.S. Treasury) which can print money at will and under which there is also no accountability as there is a high probability that there has been more money printed than claimed on the balance sheet. Now you would ask…WHAT! Can you find a foot note on the U.S. balance sheet for pallets of cash totaling billions of dollars sent to Iran by the orders of the then president? Where exactly did that money come from? Given the proven terrorism against the U.S. and across the globe by the Iranian government, before and after the then president sent billions in cash on pallets to the Iranian government, how exactly is that not Treason?
Justice Clarence Thomas argued in his concurring opinion in Michigan v. Environmental Protection Agency that Chevron deference is unconstitutional and asked the court to re-evaluate its use.
Justice Neil Gorsuch has also been vocal in his opposition to Chevron, writing a scathing concurring opinion for the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit in Gutierrez-Brizuela v. Lynch.
He writes:
“What would happen in a world without Chevron? If this goliath of modern administrative law were to fall? Surely Congress could and would continue to pass statutes for executive agencies to enforce. And just as surely agencies could and would continue to offer guidance on how they intend to enforce those statutes. The only difference would be that courts would then fulfill their duty to exercise their independent judgment about what the law is. Of course, courts could and would consult agency views and apply the agency’s interpretation when it accords with the best reading of a statute.”
He continues:
“But de novo judicial review of the law’s meaning would limit the ability of an agency to alter and amend existing law. It would avoid the due process and equal protection problems of the kind documented in our decisions. It would promote reliance interests by allowing citizens to organize their affairs with some assurance that the rug will not be pulled from under them tomorrow, the next day, or after the next election. And an agency’s recourse for a judicial declaration of the law’s meaning that it dislikes would be precisely the recourse the Constitution prescribes—an appeal to higher judicial authority or a new law enacted consistent with bicameralism and presentment. We managed to live with the administrative state before Chevron. We could do it again.”
The problem is the size of administrative state and many of these divisions were created to fix a temporary issue (that as time proves, was more than likely a contrived issue) but in the world of government, what is created on a temporary basis becomes engrained into the system which grows larger and more fraudulent, just like compound interest, by the nano-second. The unelected agencies and the regulators within issue rules and make decisions without direct accountability to voters and without having a clue what their job is or the underlying ramifications of their decisions, nor do they care because it is not about the Citizens, it is simply “I got mine and the hell with everybody else” i.e. aka the socialist and communist mantra. Both on a Federal and State level, these entities were originally created to carry out the laws passed by Congress or State Legislatures, but they have increasingly taken on a life of their own. Today, many of the most significant policy decisions are made not by our elected officials but by career bureaucrats, agency heads, or subbed out to private industry that regurgitates fraudulent information, and or claims to utilize information such as USPAP, but in reality, has never read or been capable of understanding USPAP and its surrounding laws, and again, does not care.
This dynamic violates the separation of powers—one of the Constitution’s most critical safeguards against tyranny. By allowing unelected officials to wield legislative or quasi-judicial power, we move away from the republic our Founders envisioned. James Madison warned us in Federalist No. 47 that "the accumulation of all powers, legislative, executive, and judiciary, in the same hands...may justly be pronounced the very definition of tyranny."
Moreover, unelected bureaucrats are often insulated from accountability. Civil service protections make it difficult to remove or discipline the bureaucratic employees, allowing them to pursue personal or ideological agendas without fear of repercussion. This has led to what some call the “deep state,” a permanent government that operates in the shadows, often at odds with the elected officials and the will of the people. The fix… shut down the entire agency via executive order and, only if necessary, rebuild it with limited well-trained staff that understands and will adhere to Constitutional law and also understands USC 42 Sec, 1983, 1985, 1986 which is the civil claim that we should be filing in Federal Court shortly against the Chief Appraiser and the entire bench of SCOTX. It is important to point out that the actions of SCOTX being “Deprivation of Rights Under Color of Law is also a crime under 18 U.S.C. § 242 which makes it a federal crime for anyone acting under color of law—including police, prison guards, and other officials—to willfully deprive a person of rights protected by the U.S. Constitution or laws, with penalties ranging from fines and up to one year in prison to life imprisonment or the death penalty if bodily injury or death results.”
A notorious example of unelected power in action is the Federal Reserve, an institution that controls monetary policy and has immense influence over the economy. The Fed’s decisions can affect everything from interest rates to employment levels, yet its leaders are not chosen by the American people. Instead, they are appointed and operate with a significant degree of independence. While the Federal Reserve claims they have a role in stabilizing the economy, its opaque operations and immense influence raise concerns about accountability and transparency in a republic that values checks and balances. If by their definition they want to stabilize the economy, then they would stop printing money not backed by assets and stop creating debt upon which the interest grows compound cumulative which creates the necessity to cover off the deficit by printing more money which grows the national debt. It is a circular problem created by the very existence of the Federal Reserve (link).
One solution to this creeping over the top bureaucracy is for Congress to reassert its constitutional authority. For too long, lawmakers have delegated their powers to regulatory agencies, allowing unelected officials to fill the void. It is time for Congress to reclaim its role and ensure that the people's voice is heard in every significant policy decision. The problem is that Congress has people that should not be there which are bought and paid for by bad special interests which is why as a body it has lost its credibility and I would make the case that it is Congress that has allowed the creation of Systemic Moral Hazard (link).
The judiciary has also begun to recognize this problem. In the 2022 case of West Virginia v. EPA, the Supreme Court ruled that the EPA had overstepped its authority by attempting to regulate carbon emissions in a way that Congress had not explicitly authorized. This decision is a step in the right direction, but more must be done to rein in the administrative state and restore the balance of power.
A danger to democracy?
Our elected politicians often seem ill-equipped to deal with the complexities of public policy, lightweight in knowledge, masters, not of substance, but of spin and presentation, and skilled at avoiding the blame for the mishaps they create by their own ignorance. To compensate for this lack of sophistication they allow the creation of unelected bodies that take many of the detailed policy decisions that affect people’s lives and make matters even worse.
Citizens who question, see Advocacy Play Book V1 and V2.
When citizens disagree with the way public policy is being formulated, their questions and criticisms, open record requests (ORRs) can be used to precisely inform the uninformed including the politician and the public. There is nothing stronger than the Court of Public Opinion which is about restoring power to the people not the government as documented in the U.S. Constitution and the Federalist Papers, and the Declaration of Independence.
A better-informed citizenry makes it much more difficult for elected politicians to play fast and loose with the facts or to claim privileged access to knowledge. Mom and Pop can use the exact same methods and systems (AI) against the unelected officials that they use against Mom and Pop, except Mom and Pop are backstopped by the facts and The Constitution of the United States of America.
In conclusion, the unchecked power of unelected officials threatens the very principles upon which our nation was founded. The American people deserve a government that is accountable to them, not to faceless bureaucrats or lifetime regulators. By restoring the balance of power and ensuring that all officials answer to the voters, we can protect the Constitution and the liberty it guarantees.
Evidence and Articles can be seen at www.mockingbirdproperties.com/dcad.
Advocacy and How To can be seen at www.realestatemindset.org.
